I do the rest in post processing, often as not with little manipulation beyond some sharpening and color/white balance adjustments. Like dabscond (see #4 and #6), I scan using only the basic - ,no sharpening or any other 'tricks', only to capture the images with reasonable contrast. It served my purposes so well that I stayed with it, and eventually decided to not invest my hard earned money in more expensive scanner gear.įor my purposes the Epson software has worked well. At that time I shot mostly architecture for book publication and internet use by my clients, not the classic perfect-verticals images but more natural, aesthetically pleasing images to appeal more to general readers than to architects.įrom the very first my V600 did all I expected of it and more. I bought a new V600 in 201? (about six years ago) for what I intended to be "temporary" use for 35mm and 6圆 (120) negatives and slides, to be used for a year or so, while I saved up enough to invest bigger buck$ in what I thought would be a better (= more expensive) scanner.Īs I am somewhat of a luddite (Nikkormats and Rolleiflex TLRs, need I say more) my learning curve with the V600 was initially quite steep, but I persevered. Of course I am thankful for any further hints to pint me in the right direction. The Digitaliza film holders seem to be an improvement. Can I achieve that with Epson Scan or is there a significant increase in image quality with VueScan/SilverFast that justifies spending money on them?Ģ. What I need is an as sharp as possible (for a flatbed) image from the scanner.ġ. That's why the scanning software doesn't need to deal with conversions/profiles. I want to make linear scans and do all the postprocessing in Photoshop (with the ColorPerfect/ColorNeg) plugin. Perharps you can save some trial and error. Of course I'd love a Nikon 9000 but that's just out of the question moneywise. So no need for a premium scanner right now. And I am also considering a darkroom (B&W) at some point. But with the V600 I will already have a good idea how the postprocessed photo will loke like and have my better images archived. The scans of my 120/135 will mostly be viewed only on the computer and if I want to print an especially good photo, I can have it scanned through a professional service (Imacon, etc.). Since most of my photography is digital and I don't want to commit a huge amount of money to a hybrid workflow, this scanner fits my budget/needs. I ordered an Epson V600 to scan 120 and 135 film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |